Back to Projects
Energy Resilience & Risk Assessment

Performance Modeling of Critical Energy Interconnection for Remote Oil Production

When power fails, production stops. This project delivered a new kind of clarity through dynamic performance modeling of critical electrical interconnection systems, transforming assumption-based planning into evidence-driven strategy.

Energy grid infrastructure abstract representation
Challenge

Remote oil production operations face critical energy reliability challenges where power dependencies on external infrastructure create unacceptable operational risks and uncertainty.

Solution

Advanced probabilistic simulation methods including Monte Carlo analysis and dynamic failure logic to assess reliability, availability, and risk exposure of interdependent energy networks.

Impact

Transformed decision-making from assumption-based planning to evidence-driven strategy, enabling leadership to see not only power loss potential but why, when, and under which conditions.

Project Abstract

For remote oil production operations, energy isn't just a utility — it's the lifeline of every barrel extracted. Yet when that power depends on infrastructure beyond your control, reliability becomes a gamble. For one upstream operator in a high-dependency environment, that uncertainty was no longer acceptable.

This project delivered a new kind of clarity: a dynamic performance model of their critical electrical interconnection system — a hybrid network linking national grid supply with local generation. Unlike static assessments or vendor promises, this digital representation simulates thousands of possible futures, capturing how equipment failures, third-party dependencies, maintenance events, and evolving regulatory conditions interact over time to shape operational continuity.

The result? A shift from assumption-based planning to evidence-driven strategy. For the first time, leadership can see not only how much power they might lose, but why, when, and under which combinations of external factors. More importantly, they can test responses before crises occur.

From exposing hidden vulnerabilities in single-point transmission links to revealing the strategic necessity of local power quality monitoring, this modeling effort doesn't just predict risk — it redefines how decisions are made in an environment where resilience is non-negotiable.

Technical Approach

This project developed a high-fidelity technical performance model for the electrical interconnection system serving a major onshore oil production facility located in a geographically isolated region. The system combines grid-sourced electricity via a long-distance transmission line with on-site diesel generation, forming a hybrid power architecture essential for continuous operations.

Conducted by Vectra Dynamics, the study applied advanced probabilistic simulation methods — including Monte Carlo analysis and dynamic failure logic — to assess the reliability, availability, and risk exposure of this interdependent energy network. The goal was not merely to validate design assumptions, but to uncover blind spots in operational planning and inform both immediate actions and long-term strategy.

Key Technologies

Monte Carlo Analysis
Dynamic Failure Logic
Probabilistic Simulation Methods
Multi-year Operational Forecasting
Scenario-based Sensitivity Analysis
Risk Exposure Quantification
Key Achievements

Modeled Real-world Interdependencies

Captured the complex relationship between third-party grid performance, internal distribution systems, and local backup capacity — including legal, regulatory, and logistical constraints outside direct operational control.

Simulated Multi-year Operational Futures

Generated probabilistic forecasts of power availability, identifying patterns of full, partial, and total unavailability across the asset lifecycle.

Identified Critical Single Points of Failure

Pinpointed structural vulnerabilities in the transmission and distribution chain, particularly at key nodes lacking redundancy.

Quantified Operational Risk Exposure

Translated power disruptions into potential impacts on hydrocarbon production, enabling economic evaluation of reliability gaps.

Integrated External Influences

Accounted for scheduled maintenance requiring full shutdowns, variable repair times, and uncertain timelines for promised infrastructure upgrades by external providers.

Mapped Failure Taxonomies

Defined and simulated realistic failure modes across subsystems, allowing traceability from root cause to production consequence.

Developed Scenario-based Sensitivity Analysis

Tested performance under adverse conditions, such as delayed redundancy projects or extended outage events, to stress-test contingency plans.

Introduced Forward-looking Decision Triggers

Recommended proactive measures, including formal power quality measurements at critical connection points, to ground future modeling in actual site conditions rather than assumptions.

Strategic Impact

The model transforms decision-making in a high-stakes context where energy security directly affects production stability, environmental compliance, and license to operate.

It enables leadership to:

Evaluate the true cost of dependence on external infrastructure
Justify investments in redundancy, monitoring, or local generation based on quantified risk reduction
Align technical planning with evolving regulatory requirements, especially where emissions or operational standards hinge on uninterrupted power
Improve coordination with third-party operators by establishing shared performance expectations and accountability frameworks
Strengthen contingency planning through validated scenarios, reducing surprise and response time during outages

Beyond technical insights, the project revealed critical gaps in data governance — particularly around equipment behavior tracking and historical downtime records — prompting recommendations for improved data collection protocols and integration with existing control systems.

Designed as a living analytical foundation, the model supports continuous refinement as new information becomes available. Its methodology is also transferable to other assets facing similar challenges of isolation, interdependence, and regulatory scrutiny.

Facing Similar Energy Resilience Challenges?

In an industry where resilience is measured in barrels preserved, not just watts delivered, this project sets a new standard for how energy risk should be understood, managed, and mitigated.